SEEKING FOR AND GUIDING TO HUMANKIND'S HIGHEST IDEALS

HOME & ABOUT US
FREE ARTICLES
BOOKS &
e-REPORTS
SPEAKING & POSTGRAD SUPERVISION
SPONSOR & DONATE
JOURNAL of VE
LINKS
CONTACT
 
Cave's Values Education Books

 

Web Design By HCS

 

WHAT'S WRONG WITH SEX EDUCATION?
By Dr Bill Robb

 
 

Sex education isn’t working and it’s clear that the agencies responsible don’t know what to do about it. A spate of recent reports and government announcements make this clear.

According to Health Protection Scotland, incidents of Chlamydia are at an all-time high with a 7.6% increase during 2005. At the same time, cases of gonorrhoea rose by 9.4% and herpes by 6%. Cases of syphilis went up from 197 in 2004 to 205 last year.

Official statistics show a rising number of girls under 14 becoming pregnant and the Government missing its target for cutting the under-18 pregnancy rate by 15 per cent from its 1998 level. The conception rates for under-18s had risen by 40 per cent since 1999 and the teenage pregnancy rate is still one of the highest in Western Europe.

The human tragedy surrounding this failure is bad enough. Even more worrying is that experts and officials responsible for the sex education curriculum and expenditure of millions of pounds, should have known that failure was inevitable.

In the early 90’s I and others were warning that the approach to sex education was flawed – and the arguments still hold today.

Firstly, there is no evidence that sex education works. In 1991 I could find no references to empirical studies on sex education. Even when I broadened my study to include any research on any of the so-called “educations” (drugs education, for example), there was no evidence of success. The limited evidence showed no change and indeed a worsening! Pregnancies went up not down after sex education.

Can you imagine any other enterprise where the policy for millions of people and expenditure of millions of pounds is based on no evidence?

Secondly, it is well understood in educational and especially psychological circles that transmission of information and techniques is never enough in solving human problems. Most of the sex education programmes I studied consisted mostly of transmission of information. At best, this approach was seen as a joke by most youngsters, many of whom knew more about sex than their teachers. At worst, it gives false confidence. If you explain the biology of reproduction and how to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases with contraception, all this does is give false confidence and encourage the act. Thank goodness I didn’t have sex education at school! There is a place for natural and healthy fear.

Thirdly, how in 2006, can any educator or politician think that we can change behaviour by telling people to behave? This is the favoured approach in “faith schools”. Youngsters are told that sex at a young age is wrong that if they indulge in it they are bad people and God will punish them. Being told how to behave annoys people and they rebel by doing the opposite. Of course, if they don’t believe in God the threat is useless. However, according to a spokesman for the Department for Education and Skills it looks as if more telling is on the way Beverley Hughes will be emphasising the message that young people should delay having sex.

Even alerting people to danger usually never work because the implications are so remote. For example, you would think that the health of one’s baby in the womb would be the highest priority of most pregnant women. Yet, why do many pregnant women smoke when they are warned by experts that “smoking harms your unborn baby”?

What’s the solution?
We need to think and act in terms of values education not sex education. Values education is not about content – a set of values or about indoctrinating. Values education is a process of open and deep discussion during which youngsters come to their own realisation of what “good” and “bad” for them. Many educators don’t believe that youngsters can arrive at answers that are good for them. My experience is that with enough time and honest discussion they are. Space in this article does not permit a detailed discussion of how values education takes place, but here is a brief summary.

A values education facilitator is skilled at Socratic questioning - helping others to see for themselves the implications of their behaviour - assessing values for long-term well-being of self and others. Facilitators must encourage people to give reasons for their views (this is the secret – having to justify).


In a values education session the facilitators' views carry no more authority than the participants’ do. This means that facilitators do not dictate what is right or wrong – but only what is right or wrong for them personally - with reasons. Anyone in the group is entitled to state why he or she would not respond in such-and-such a way, and other members of the group are entitled to respectfully test the reasoning of fellow-participants.
A consensus may emerge, but facilitators should ensure that this is not forced and the consensus view should not be forced, explicitly or implicitly, on any person. Naturally, many questions will arise from this outline. However, there is encouraging evidence that a values education approach works.

In the San Marcos school district in the USA a values education programme reduced teenage pregnancies over two years from 147 to 20. In the North Kansa City School system pregnancies at one school dropped from 48 in 89/90 to 24 the next year.

Summary
Spending another £15million over three years to deliver improved access to sexual health services, giving free condoms to children — possibly as young as 12 — in sports halls, shops and swimming baths, and making children more knowledgeable about abortion (some of the government suggestions) are only treating the symptoms. A values education approach, done properly, will cure much of the cause. All we need now are government education departments and curriculum bodies to pay attention to and think clearly about what is already known.

Bill Robb is a management and education consultant based in Aberdeen, Scotland. For more information and resources on values education or to invite Dr Robb to speak at your event go to www.valueseducation.co.uk. This article was originally published as Sex, drugs and the Socratic method in the TES October 13, 2006, page 19.


 

 
 
 

Cave Values Education

 
 

Home & About Us ‌  ‌Free Articles ‌  Books & eReports ‌  Speaking & Postgrad Supervisione ‌  Sponsor & Donate ‌  Journal of VE  ‌  Links ‌  Contact

© Copyright 2007 Values Education Ltd  Last Update 24 Sep 2008