SEEKING FOR AND GUIDING TO HUMANKIND'S HIGHEST IDEALS

HOME & ABOUT US
FREE ARTICLES
BOOKS
e-REPORTS
SPEAKING & POSTGRAD SUPERVISION
SPONSOR & DONATE
JOURNAL of VE
LINKS
CONTACT
 
Cave's Values Education Books

Web Design By HCS

 

Character Education – The Flaw in Using Lists of Values
By Dr Bill Robb

 
 

Character education, like many other so-called “educations” is based on inculcating a list of values. I think this approach to character education is flawed for four main reasons. 

Firstly, what values – some people call them virtues - do you choose?. I recently read about this long list:  

Assertiveness Caring Cleanliness Commitment Compassion Confidence Consideration Cooperation Courage Courtesy Creativity Detachment

 
 

Determination Diligence Enthusiasm Excellence Flexibility Forgiveness Friendliness Generosity Gentleness Helpfulness Honesty Honour Humility Idealism Integrity Joyfulness Justice Kindness Love Loyalty Moderation Modesty Orderliness Patience Peacefulness Perseverance Purposefulness Reliability Respect Responsibility Self-discipline Service Tact Thankfulness Tolerance Trust Trustworthiness Truthfulness Understanding and Unity. 

I suppose we could another fifty traits to be used in character education. So who decides what values will be imparted? 

Secondly, the values are abstract and it will take considerable mental effort to translate into the kind of behaviour needed to lessen undesirable behaviour. Why spend time debating the meaning of a value and what values go to make up a good character when you can tackle the undesirable behaviour (“bad character”) issue directly? Let’s take drug abuse for example. In a character education class you could discuss till you’re blue in the face that not taking drugs requires a person to be assertive and confident in saying “no”, having respect for your parents and own body and being self-disciplined. And this discussion might still not affect behaviour. You could also discuss that encouraging someone to use drugs (giving them the drug) is not friendliness, helpfulness, love and so on. 

Thirdly, acting according to many values does not necessarily make one a responsible person – of good character. For example, a bank robber could be clean, confident, cooperative, courageous, reliable and loyal – and so on. If a bank robber attended a character education class the objective would be to get him to stop robbing banks not learn about a whole bunch of nice traits. 

Fourthly, sometimes to be a good person, to be ethical, you have to ignore the value and do the opposite. For example, if a group of thugs is chasing a young boy because they want to beat him up, and you see him hide, you should not tell the truth if the thugs ask you if you have seen the boy. 

Instead of all this cogitating, wouldn’t character education be more effective by raising a social issue directly and then discussing it in a way that brings people to their own realisation of what behaviour would best benefit them and everyone else? 

There is considerable scope for research on the effectiveness of character education. Dr Bill would be happy to assist postgraduate students (with approval of their university or college).  Contact him on bill@valueseducation.co.uk

 Copyright © 2008 Values Education Ltd

Note to editors. Feel free to use this article as long as the following details are retained. “A values education article from CAVE  www.valueseducation.co.uk
 

 
 

 

Home & About Us ‌  ‌Free Articles ‌  Books & eReports ‌  Speaking & Postgrad Supervisione ‌  Sponsor & Donate ‌  Journal of VE  ‌  Links ‌  Contact

© Copyright 2009 Values Education Ltd  Last Update 17 Feb 2009