SEEKING FOR AND GUIDING TO HUMANKIND'S HIGHEST IDEALS

HOME & ABOUT US
FREE ARTICLES
BOOKS
e-REPORTS
SPEAKING & POSTGRAD SUPERVISION
SPONSOR & DONATE
JOURNAL of VE
LINKS
CONTACT
 
Cave's Values Education Books

 

Web Design By HCS

 

Citizenship Education – Politicians Are Setting the Wrong Example
By Dr Bill Robb

 

 

Citizenship education is very difficult to define and this difficulty with definition is the topic for another article. In the meantime, using a commonsense approach, we can say that societies want citizenship education built into a curriculum because we believe it will help people to behave as responsible citizens. Differences of opinion on what  “responsible citizen” means is a major stumbling block in making citizenship education practical.

Again, in the meantime and using commonsense, we have a rough idea about what we mean.

 

 

Of course, in citizenship  education we could spend time on all the technical issues involved  in the relationship between citizens and the state.  However, when we say “citizenship education” we usually mean more than that. We imply that a good citizen is someone who treats people (irrespective of gender, race, religion and disability) with respect, does what she promises, is honest in all dealings, obeys the laws of the land and in general, refrains from hurting others physically and mentally. 

It is well known that success in trying to change behaviour depends to a large degree (we’re not sure how much) on the example set by those who are more experienced or in authority. It stands to reason that if we want youngsters to be good citizens we have to show them examples of it and convince them that we are serious about it – it is not just all talk.  

Parents, educators, youth workers, company managers, ministers of religion and prison officers, for example could be involved in citizenship education and their behaviours  scrutinised (consciously or subconsciously) by those they are trying to influence. However, perhaps the most visible leaders of all are politicians - those who are responsible for guiding the policy of a nation and who repeatedly make calls for good citizenship. 

Politicians – examples of  “bad citizenship” 

Unfortunately, in many western countries there is a distrust and dislike for politicians. Perhaps many people feel this way because when you examine their conduct, politicians are poor citizenship educators. 

Let’s take behaviour in the United Kingdom Parliament. Politicians, shout mocking abuse at one another in order to drown out what the other is saying and to belittle. Prime Minister’s Question Time is not about questions at all, but some kind of ritual to mock and embarrass and score points. Watch the television and see the lesser bad behaviours of litter (order papers left lying on the benches) and a few MPs sleeping. A citizenship education class with children would quickly point out these bad examples of citizenship. 

Here’s another example. Politicians often do not answer the questions put to them – probably because they know it will reveal their mistakes or because they don’t want to commit themselves. They compound this bad behaviour by trying to fool people into believing they are answering the question when they aren’t or by telling half-truths. 

Citizenship education encourages people to be helpful and kind to others because in the long-run this is good for everyone. However, politicians rarely praise the good work of their opponents and often take their small mistakes and make them out to be heinous crimes. Again the purpose is to denigrate, wound and damage others. 

The examples of bad citizenship exhibited by many politicians run deep. Some politicians gloss over conflicts of interest. Often they know the tough actions to be taken but don’t take them because they know it will be unpopular and they’ll be out of a job. So they tinker around the edges of major problems, pretending to be doing something. They are there to represent their constituents but in the end, support their party because again they’ll be out of a job if they don’t. 

And then there is the lesser citizenship flaw of two-facedness. Asking others to “tighten their belts” while increasing their own wages and perks, hiring family members and paying them whether they do any work or not, demeaning private schooling while sending their own children there and criticising “fat cat” managers who are paid high salaries while they themselves are already, or will become, highly paid company directors. 

As we know, almost all citizens, even young children, are not stupid and they know or sense bad citizenship when they see it. It is understandable then that any formal programme of citizenship education will be less effective if politicians continue to behave badly. The example given on a daily basis by many politicians gives the signal that citizenship education is a theoretical exercise  - something that sounds good but not applied in real life. For a more detailed examination of citizenship education download and read  e-Report No. 2 Values Education And Citizenship Education: Do We Need Both?  ISBN  1  898896  09  7 

Dr Bill would be delighted to talk at your next conference or event and give more details on how a citizenship education as values education can help people behave even more responsibly. Contact him on bill@valueseducation.co.uk


Copyright © 2008 Values Education Ltd
Note to editors. Feel free to use this article as long as the following details are retained. “A values education article from CAVE http://www.valueseducation.co.uk

 

 
 

Contact Cave to place your advertisement here.

 

Home & About Us ‌  ‌Free Articles ‌  Books & eReports ‌  Speaking & Postgrad Supervisione ‌  Sponsor & Donate ‌  Journal of VE  ‌  Links ‌  Contact

© Copyright 2007 Values Education Ltd  Last Update 17 Feb 2009