SEEKING FOR AND GUIDING TO HUMANKIND'S HIGHEST IDEALS

HOME & ABOUT US
FREE ARTICLES
BOOKS
e-REPORTS
SPEAKING & POSTGRAD SUPERVISION
SPONSOR & DONATE
JOURNAL of VE
LINKS
CONTACT
 
Cave's Values Education Books

 

Web Design By HCS

 

Environmental Education – The Facts Are Not Enough
By Dr Bill Robb

 

Environmental education, has as its main purpose, convincing others to look after the environment in all its various forms. We want to stop people polluting, littering and destroying. We know we live on a wonderful planet with finite resources and if we don’t look after them human life will become extinct earlier than it should. 

Now it is possible to get people to behave responsibly by punishing through fines, community service or even jail. Indeed, with understandable anger some people  may feel that when a factory owner dumps

 

toxic chemicals in a river or a car driver dumps the contents of his ashtray in city street, severe punishment would teach a lesson. 

However, punishment is only a short-term measure and only treats the symptoms. We need a way to show people how environmental damage is, in effect, damaging them and their families – even their great grand children. How do you get this through to 10 and 15 years-olds? 

Environmental education has potential as a more permanent solution. However, there is a problem with much of the environmental education I have read about. It seems to focus on the technical such as sources of carbon and chemical reactions that cause global warming. Much environmental education focuses on how many tonnes of litter are dropped and what type it is and the biological effect it has on animals.  There is also considerable study of the amounts and types of chemical pollutants in the air and in rivers and seas and how these pollutants circulate and the discomfort and diseases they cause. 

Honestly, what effect will all this technical knowledge have on the behaviour of those who pollute and litter and destroy? I would claim very little. All this research is great and produces facts that can back up arguments but facts don’t change behaviours only emotions do that. For clarity’s sake, the fact-finding and their transmission to others should be called environmental studies not environmental education. 

Consequently, environmental education will only be effective if we get people to reflect on the real emotional and personal cost to them and others. You might hear the comment “Okay, I know all the elephants in Africa will be extinct by the year 2020 but so what – the dinosaurs are extinct with no negative effect on us”. How do you overcome that view? 

Using a values education approach to environmental education requires that 80% of the time is spent discussing in detail in open, direct and honest dialogue what the consequences are for our children and grand children and us now. It has to be made personal – your life and your family. Environmental education has to tap into people’s hearts and generate compassion, empathy and caring. 

This will not be easy because perhaps those who are inclined to pollute and litter have had little experience of these values in their home life. In another article I’ll give an example of how a values-based environmental education class could be conducted. 

Environmental education as values education is a field crying out for more research. Dr Bill would be delighted to advise postgraduate students (with the agreement of their university or college) interested in this fascinating field.  Contact him on bill@valueseducation.co.uk 

Copyright © 2008 Values Education Ltd

Note to editors. Feel free to use this article as long as the following details are retained. “A values education article from CAVE  www.valueseducation.co.uk

 

 
 

Click here - To Download VE e-Reports

 

 Home & About Us ‌  ‌Free Articles ‌  Books & eReports ‌  Speaking & Postgrad Supervisione ‌  Sponsor & Donate ‌  Journal of VE  ‌  Links ‌  Contact

© Copyright 2009 Values Education Ltd  Last Update 17 Feb 2009