|
cost of increased household
insurance, car insurance, and the fitting of burglar alarms and other
security devices. It runs into hundreds of millions – funds that could
be spent on making life better, instead of mitigating and recovering
from loss.
So how do we go about educating
people so they don’t want to commit crimes – or even if they want to –
still don’t. Clearly, lectures and instruction are not working and
although threats of punishment work, we don’t know to what extent.
I propose a values education
approach to crime education where you take a topic such as burglary
and explore every angle of it in an open and honest extensive
dialogue. Here’s an initial attempt to show what a dialogue on
burglary would look like. The bold text is the facilitator’s
questions. The text in square brackets is responses of the educands or
a note from me about the question.
Why do people break into
people’s houses and cars? [Responses: a) to get money to buy
things and drugs b) to get things they want c) excitement – something
to do and to feel important].
What other ways could they get
money? [Responses: a) ask friends and relatives b) go on the
dole/welfare c) get a job].
What if their friends and
family don’t have money and if they are disqualified from benefits or
they don’t want to work? [Responses: a) just give people the money
anyway – at least it would stop burglary b) people should be made to
work – given work to do to contribute].
Do all poor people steal?
[Response: of course not – so it’s more than just lack of money].
How else can we get
excitement and feel important? [Responses: a) by finding a job and
making a real contribution b) voluntary working helping people c)
taking up a dangerous sport and doing well and even d) turning away
from crime and talking to other kids on not to do burglary and helping
the Police combat burglary].
So is it okay to burgle
sometimes? [Responses: no because a) people work hard for what
they have b) it will cause great worry and inconvenience c) people
will worry all the time because it could happen again d) people will
have to spend more money to replace the stolen items and fix broken
doors and windows e) most people won’t like you f) if you get caught
you’ll be fined or maybe go to jail and g) eventually you’d feel bad
because people despise thieves.
What about burgling a house of
a very rich person – they wouldn’t miss the things stolen and could
easily replace them? [Responses: it would still be wrong for the
reasons given above].
Don’t you think rich people
would feel just as upset at having their house invaded? [Response:
yes].
Has anyone here been burgled –
what did they take and how did it affect you and your family?
[Allow lots of personal stories and focus on the pain caused].
Why would you not steal?
[Responses: a) it would upset my parents b) people would not want to
play with me c) I would feel bad d) I don’t want to get caught and be
punished].
Did you know that all the
costs to prevent and recover from burglary amount to £2.8 billion
each year (article 26895 on website secritypark.net) – what does that mean for you and me?
[Responses: a) people are wasting money when they could use it on
better things b) insurances costs will go up and the prices of
everything go up and we are poorer as a result.
I admit that the sample dialogue
I’ve presented is a very poor beginning and much more work needs to be
done in this field. For example, the types of questions asked and
concepts used (economics) would have to fit the age-group of the
educands. I hope colleagues in crime education will explore this
further. The free e-report What is Values Education and so What?
will give you more ideas on how to conduct this kind of Socratic
dialogue.
There is considerable scope for research in the field of
crime
education and Dr Bill would be happy to assist postgraduate students
(with approval of their university or college) design and undertake a
study. Contact him on
bill.robb@valueseducation.co.uk
Copyright © 2008 Values Education Ltd
Note to editors. Feel free to use this article as long as the
following details are retained. “A values education article from CAVE
www.valueseducation.co.uk
” |