SEEKING FOR AND GUIDING TO HUMANKIND'S HIGHEST IDEALS

HOME & ABOUT US
FREE ARTICLES
BOOKS
e-REPORTS
SPEAKING & POSTGRAD SUPERVISION
SPONSOR & DONATE
JOURNAL of VE
LINKS
CONTACT
 
Cave's Values Education Books

Web Design By HCS

 

Religious Education – Why Not Religious Studies Or Religious Instruction?
By Dr Bill Robb

 
 

Religious education seems to imply more than just the study of religions. To me, religious education hints at convincing people to become more religious, which in turn means behaving according to the tenets of a religion.

Some may deny this. In Scotland for example the government guidance on religious education states “many faiths or none”. As a side issue, one must ask why use “many faiths” instead of “many religions”. However, some schools and communities   would   insist   that   religious

 
 

education involves participating in the religious doctrines and traditions of a particular religion. Indeed, in the United Kingdom there are stipulations that a certain percentage of time in religious education must deal with Christianity. 

I can understand how a study of religions began, how their rules of behaviour and ceremonies differ. However, surely a reason for studying religions is to understand the messages on how we should behave.  If the way of conveying a religion’s rules for behaviour is dogmatic – that is the rules should be obeyed without question, then that is not religious education but religious instruction. 

If the aim of religious education is to get people to behave better towards one another, it will only achieve this effectively if people are allowed to:

  • disagree with any teaching, showing why it is irrelevant to the modern world

  • suggest that some religious practices are immoral and even cruel (female circumcision or chopping off someone’s left hand for theft, say)

  • suggest better more ethical rules for behaviour

  • discuss whether atheism is okay and that atheists are still good people.

In another article I show just how difficult it will be for religious educators to allow the questioning indicated by those four bullet points. Since most of a religion’s rule for responsible behaviour become morals, why do we need religious education because we already have moral education?  

Even more seriously, if under the pretence of religious education, a school or other organisation was attempting to inculcate a particular religion’s values, this should not be allowed. Instruction in a religion, where the main aim is to (however subtly) convert people to that religion, should be made explicit. 

Since all religions have many values which if followed would result in responsible behaviour, wouldn’t it be better to do away with religious education and call the subject values education? 

Very religious people may take offence at some of my thinking in this article. If they do, isn’t that an opportunity to learn? Why would they be so upset and why would they be against honest open discussion or the values of the rules their religion promotes?  You’ll can get a more in-depth knowledge of how a values education approach to religious education could work by reading the e-report What is Values Education and so What? 

There is considerable scope for research in the field of religious education as values education and Dr Bill would be happy to assist postgraduate students (with approval of their university or college).  Contact him on  bill@valueseducation.co.uk


Copyright © 2008 Values Education Ltd
Note to editors. Feel free to use this article as long as the following details are retained. “A values education article from CAVE www.valueseducation.co.uk
 

 
 

Contact Cave to place your advertisement here.

 

Home & About Us ‌  ‌Free Articles ‌  Books & eReports ‌  Speaking & Postgrad Supervisione ‌  Sponsor & Donate ‌  Journal of VE  ‌  Links ‌  Contact

© Copyright 2009 Values Education Ltd  Last Update 17 Feb 2009