| |
Ethics abound in private and public organisations and educational institutions are bombarded with advice and
materials on moral education, religious education, spiritual education,
drugs education, sex education and personal and social education, to
name only a few.
However, what can we make of spiritual education?
Unfortunately, there is ample research to show that many of these
“educations” are not having the desired effect. Crime and social
problems and the accompanying misery are increasing. Why? In my
experience all these efforts are in the main failing for three main
reasons.
-
Insufficient time, resources and energy are devoted to
them. To give only one example: in Scottish primary and secondary
schools the recommended minimum curriculum time allocated to religious
and moral education is 10% and 5% respectively. Even this meager time
is diluted as the time is often used for "more important matters".
-
Most of the many "educations" whose stated
purpose is to help people behave more responsibly, concentrate on
transmitting technical information instead of getting people to think
about the consequences of their actions and why they should behave
responsibly.
-
There is still too much telling. Pupils are told what
values to abide by, managers and employees are told what the corporate
values are and what codes of conduct must be obeyed.
-
Officialdom's unwillingness to examine carefully new
ideas and fear of change (changing one's mind for many in our culture
is seen as a weakness - an initial mistake).
Values education offers a glimmer of hope.
It is a non-indoctrinatory, non-telling way of getting people to
evaluate their values for their own well-being and the well-being of
others. It can be done with almost any age group, but it is not easy.
For the time that values education is underway, the teacher's or
facilitator's opinion is treated as no more and no less important than
other participants' opinions.
If the topic in a values education class was, "Is science really
benefiting humankind" questions such as the following could be explored.
What is a responsible scientist? Are scientists really making life
better? What rules should scientists follow to help them be good
scientists? Should scientists work on projects such as the hydrogen bomb
knowing that their knowledge will be used to kill thousands of people? A
company pays a scientist to develop a wonder drug to cure all cancers,
and the scientist succeeds. At the beginning of the project the
scientist agreed that the company was the sole owner of the formulas for
the drug. The company decides to sell the drug at such a high price that
only rich people can afford it. Should the scientist steal the formula
and make it available to everyone?
Some people belittle the Socratic dialogue that striving to answer such
questions in a values education class involves. They see it as going
round in circles and achieving nothing concrete. However, a more
extensive study would show that values education, if persisted in,
requires people to penetrate to the ultimate questions: What does it
mean to be human? Why am I here? Where am I going? These ultimate
questions are often referred to as spiritual questions. Another question
shows the interrelatedness of values and spirituality: What do I have to
do to become even more human, that is, how must I respond to others if I
am to experience meaningfulness in the face of nothingness? Surely that
is one of the ultimate spiritual questions? And are these not the kinds
of questions that would be discussed in a spiritual education class?
There are many possibilities for research in the field of spiritual
education and values education. Dr Bill would be happy to assist
postgraduate students (with the approval of their university or college)
devise research topics and conduct a study.
Contact Dr Bill Robb
Copyright
© 2008 Values Education Ltd
Note to editors.
Feel free to use this article as long as the following details are
retained. “A values education article from CAVE
www.valueseducation.co.uk ”
 |
|